Showing posts with label Massachusetts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Massachusetts. Show all posts

Saturday, August 23, 2025

Mary Ludden Bagley and company

I found a series of legal filings in Boston in the 1720's. The suits involved a salt meadow in Weymouth owned by James Ludden one of the original settlers of Weymouth. Several histories reference a guide named Ludham who carried the colonial governor across the Great river in 1632 (For example, see The history and antiquities of Boston, p. 145) James was possibly a soldier closely associated with Captain John Holbrook. This is plausible - James was fined in 1640 for not having gunpowder. (See Records of the governor and company of the Massachusetts bay in New England. p. 311) James had three daughters born in Weymouth between 1636 and 1642. James Ludden and his wife Alice has a son, John in 1656. James was one of the original settlers of Weymouth, receiving a lot in 1651.  In his 1688 will, James Ludden listed his sons James, Joseph, and Benjamin by name. He mentions a wife and grandchildren. He appoints his wife and sons Benjamin and James executors of his will. Old James Ludden died in 1692. In 1693 when the inventory of his estate was filed, James his son was the only surviving executor. The lawsuits from the 1720's list Samuel Bagley of Braintree, mason and Joseph Bagley of Providence as grandchildren of James Ludden and heirs of Mary showing their mother Mary Bagley is the daughter of James Ludden.

This contradicts prior research that identified the wife of James Puffer as Mary Ludden. In 1915, George Nutt, identified Mary Swalden who married James Puffer in 1656 as Mary Ludden. (see Descendants of George Puffer of Braintree, Massachusetts, 1639-1915. p. 17) This has been referenced by several researchers since. The lawsuits show this is incorrect. In the images of the original marriage record the name Swalden appears similar to the name transcribed as "Swilven" written in the same hand. This record refers to the marriage of a Jael Sullivan who was imported to Massachusetts as an indentured servant. (See Brides from Bridewell : female felons sent to colonial America. p. 107-9) It at least plausible, Swalden should have been transcribed as Swilvan and Mary is a Gaelic speaking indentured servant. We would likely write her name, "Mary Sullivan".

Currently, the mother of Mary Ludden is identified by several researchers as Mary Alice Johnson. This is likely an attempt to reconcile contradicting sources for the wife of James Ludden. It is unlikely Mary Alice is a single person - neither Alice nor Mary is a common diminutive for the other. The Puritans did not often use diminutives; and English colonial families did not regularly use middle names until after the American revolution. In some areas of New England middle names were not common until after the Civil War. One original record names the wife of James, John's mother, as Alice; however, John could be the son or grandson of the father of Mary. This gives us a few possibilities:

  • James the father of Mary Ludden Bagley married a woman named Alice and all of his children are the children of Alice born between 1636 and 1756
  • James the father of Mary Ludden Bagley married a woman named Mary and later married a woman named Alice who is the mother of John.  
  • James the brother of Mary Ludden Bagley was born before 1636 and is the husband of Alice and father of John.

Raymond Tingley identified James wife as Mary Johnson, daughter of Davy and Elizabeth Johnson of Weymouth. (See Some Ancestral Lines, p. 166, 211.) Tingley noted a marriage date for James and Mary and assigned John to the son James and wife Alice. As Tingley noted James Ludden was associated with the Johnson family - in 1636 James was involved the settlement of a lawsuit with the widow of Davy and Willliam Almy. (See Records of the governor and company of the Massachusetts. p. 64) James is identified as the servant of both Davy Johnson and William Almy. James was also fined for drunkenness at that time. Unfortunately, Tingley is noted for "making shit up". (See https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Category:Raymon_Meyers_Tingley_Fraud) Some index records indicate there are family trees and other documents that list Alice Kinham as James wife. Others indicate she was the wife of James' son. Alice Kinham was a servant of the Lovell family who arrived in 1636 with a group from Somerset. She was 22 at the time making her birth in 1613 or 1614. Some researchers have suggested she is the daughter of the Kingman family that arrived at the same time. Others have refuted this claim. If she is the daughter of the Kingman family she may have married a man named Barnard.

Alice Kinham could plausibly be the mother of Marry Ludden. She arrived in 1635. There is plenty of time for her to conceive a child before February 1637. Alice Kinham would be around 43 when John was born. If the Alice is the mother of all of James children the family would be

James Ludden (1608? - 1692) m. about 1636 Alice Kinham (1613 - before 1693)
    1. Mary Ludden (14 Feb 1637 - before 1711) m. Samuel Bagley (1630?-Feb 1711)
    2. Sarah Ludden (15 Jan 1640 - before 1642)
    3. Sarah Ludden (5 Aug 1642 - 22 July 1700) m. Daniel Fairfield
    4. James Ludden (1644? - 19 November 1716) 
    5. Joseph Ludden (1646? - 1690?)
    6. Benjamin Ludden (1648? - 28 January 1690)  m. Eunice Holbrook
    7. John Ludden (13 January 1656 - 1680?)

We know from the existing published records James Ludden was a sometime servant of Davy Johnson.  There are no recorded children for David/Davy Johnson. Does a daughter of David Johnson named Mary Johnson exist? If she does, James Ludden would have needed his masters' permission to marry. Would Davy have allowed his servant to marry his daughter? If he did and Alice is the second wife the family could be (assigning the children with a birth record to Mary and all the others to Alice)

James Ludden (1608? - 1692) m. 10 February 1636 Mary Johnson (1614?-1642?)
  1. Mary Ludden (14 Feb 1637 - before 1711) m. Samuel Bagley (1630?-Feb 1711)
  2. Sarah Ludden (15 Jan 1640 - before 1642)
  3. Sarah Ludden (5 Aug 1642 - 22 July 1700) m. Daniel Fairfield
m. Alice [Kinham?] (1613? - before 1693)

  1. James Ludden (1644? - 19 November 1716) 
  2. Joseph Ludden (1646? - 1690?)
  3. Benjamin Ludden (1648? - 28 January 1690)  m. Eunice Holbrook
  4. John Ludden (13 January 1656 - 1680?) 
If James the son were the husband of Alice - we would need to either add another mother or have a child prior to the marriage date given by Tingley:
 
James Ludden (1608? - 1692) m. 1631? Mary Johnson? (1614? - before 1693)
  1. James Ludden (1632? - 19 November 1716) m. Alice?
    1.  John Ludden (13 January 1656 - 1680?) 
  2. Mary Ludden (14 Feb 1637 - before 1711) m. Samuel Bagley (1630?-Feb 1711)
  3. Sarah Ludden (15 Jan 1640 - before 1642)
  4. Sarah Ludden (5 Aug 1642 - 22 July 1700) m. Daniel Fairfield
  5. Joseph Ludden (1646? - 1690?)
  6. Benjamin Ludden (1648? - 28 January 1690)  m. Eunice Holbrook
 Or
James Ludden (1608? - 1692) m. 1631? mother of James
  1. James Ludden (1632? - 19 November 1716) m. Alice?
    1.  John Ludden (13 January 1656 - 1680?) 
James Ludden (1608? - 1692) m. 10 February 1636? Mary Johnson? (1614? - before 1693)
  1. Mary Ludden (14 Feb 1637 - before 1711) m. Samuel Bagley (1630?-Feb 1711)
  2. Sarah Ludden (15 Jan 1640 - before 1642)
  3. Sarah Ludden (5 Aug 1642 - 22 July 1700) m. Daniel Fairfield
  4. Joseph Ludden (1646? - 1690?)
  5. Benjamin Ludden (1648? - 28 January 1690)  m. Eunice Holbrook
  6.  

Saturday, June 21, 2025

The Bagley Family in Berkshire, Columbia, and Litchfield Counties

Introduction

In the middle of the 18th century, western Massachusetts was the frontier. What would become Berkshire county was being settled by people from New England from the east and people from New York from the west. Records are thin for this period, but there is evidence individuals with the name Bagley settled and/or owned land in the area. Records for this area during this era can be found in the neighboring counties in Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New York. i.e. Hampshire county prior to 1761, Berkshire County after 1761, Fairfield county prior to 1751, Litchfield county after 1751 and the part of Albany county that would become Columbia.

Savoy and the descendants of Joseph Bagley

In the land records of Berkshire County, there are references starting in 1773 to Samuel Bagley of Smithfield, Rhode Island. The original rights came from James Bagley and John Bagley.1,2,3,4,5 Samuel Bagley and his heirs sold portions of the land through 1803. At least some of the land stayed in the family. David Jenks, the son of Margaret (Bagley) Jenks purchase land rights in Savoy from his parents and aunts and uncles.2,3,4

Samuel is the only documented child of Deacon Joseph Bagley of Providence.6 The relationship between James, John and Samuel is not clear. Joseph has older brothers, James (b 1663) and John (b.1668).7,8,9 John is believed to have moved to Fairfield, Connecticut. This raises the following questions:

  • Who are James and John?
  • Are they related to Samuel Bagley of Smithfield? If so, how?
  • When and how was the land transferred to Samuel?

Following the Land

The land in question was part of Bullock's Grant. Bullock's Grant was "Granted in Lieu of a Township formerly Granted to Capt. Samuel Gallup Anno Domini..1690."10 Captain Samuel Gallup lead a regiment during an English expedition to conquer Quebec in 1690. This land was then a military grant to the soldiers of Samuel Gallup's regiment. John Bagley is listed as a private in this regiment.11 This is possibly the brother of Joseph Bagley, who would have been about 22 at the time of the expedition. On 22 June 1772, the proprietors of the Bullock's Grant assigned lots.12 John Bagley was assigned lots 22, 84, 140, and 41; James Bagley was assigned lots  39, 155, 106, and 24. 

In the 22 May 1781 proprietors' meeting notes, the owners of John Bagley's lots are the heirs of Samuel Bagley.13 The lots granted to James are owned by the heirs of Samll Bagley and Stephanis Attwood. Samuel Bagley of Smithfield's children and grandchildren sold lots in both groups. At some time between 1772 and 1781 the rights to the grant were transferred. Samuel Bagley died in 1773, so the rights may have been transferred before then. The rights could have been transferred one of two ways:

  • The rights were inherited
  • The rights were purchased

The shared family name may indicate a relationship between the three men. The method of transfer impacts how we would interpret the relationship between Samuel, John, and James. If the rights were inherited we would need to show how the family relationship or legal documentation supporting the inheritance. If the rights were sold, no family relationship would be implied by the transfer.

Identifying James and John Bagley

James and John Bagley could be related to Samuel. Samuel's father Joseph had brother's named John and James. The men would have been in over 100 if they where still alive in 1772. This makes it unlikely these two men receiving lots in 1772 are the brothers of Joseph. If they are the brothers of Samuel, there are several gaps - there are no records for James or John in Rhodes Island or the neighboring parts of Massachusetts after 1694.14 Records for John Bagley in Fairfield start in 1698.15 John's children recorded in Fairfield are:16

  • Joseph bp. 1700
  • Josiah bp. 1702
  • James bp. 1704
  • Mary bp. 1707
  • Sarah bp. 1709
  • Ann bp. 1711 

The son James could plausibly be still alive in 1772; he would be around 68. There is no John listed in this group of children. If the lots are being passed to John the private, the only recorded grandchildren for this group is Lydia and Bathia Bagley daughters of James Bagley and Bethia his wife.17  We have records for Lydia, James, and John Bagley in the Berkshire county region from about 1757. I have argued James, John, and Lydia are possibly the children of James and Bethia.18 James and John could possibly be the heirs of John Bagley through his son James Bagley.19

Determining how Samuel received the right to the land

If Samuel Bagley inherited the land from James and John, it is plausible Samuel received the land because James and John were dead and had no heirs. This would make sense if it were his uncle John, born in 1668 and Mary Dikeman is not the daughter of John. Josiah would have died in  New York without heirs indicating he is not the father of Josiah and William. However, we don't have a good identification for James, nor can we explain why the rights transferred to Samuel and not to his first cousins the descendants of Samuel Bagley Jr and Mary Thayer. 

If  Samuel purchased the land we have more flexibility to interpret the transfer. We still may question the absence of the possible heirs of John through Mary Dikeman and Josiah Bagley of Manhattan; however, the families do not need to be related. If James and John are the grandsons of John, Samuel would be their father's first cousin. It is plausible that James the son of John had died - he is not given the lots. James and John sold their shares in Bullocks purchase to a family member who has more cash, in this case their father's cousin. After Samuel's death the land goes to his heirs. This seems especially likely since Samuel sold land in 1773 to Joseph Brigham shortly before his death.20 

Summary Conclusions

Based on the available records. Samuel likely purchased the land in Berkshire county from James and John Bagley. James and John are possibly the grandsons of private John Bagley. Plausibly they sold the land to a relative, in this case their father's cousin, who had more readily available cash. 

Notes and Sources

1"Massachusetts, Land Records, 1620-1986," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G9Z8-2QNH?cc=2106411&wc=MCBT-FP8%3A361613101%2C362672601 : 22 May 2014), Berkshire > Deeds 1788-1793 vol 1-2 > image 362 of 500; county courthouses and offices, Massachusetts. 

2"Massachusetts, Land Records, 1620-1986," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9Z8-2Z2B?cc=2106411&wc=MCBT-VNR%3A361613101%2C362736101 : 22 May 2014), Berkshire > Deeds 1839-1843 vol 52-53 > image 317 of 586; county courthouses and offices, Massachusetts.

3"Massachusetts, Land Records, 1620-1986," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-89Z8-2JX?cc=2106411&wc=MCBT-NM3%3A361613101%2C362673501 : 22 May 2014), Berkshire > Deeds 1791-1796 vol 3-4 > image 423 of 546; county courthouses and offices, Massachusetts.

4"Massachusetts, Land Records, 1620-1986," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G9Z8-2XF?cc=2106411&wc=MCBT-NM3%3A361613101%2C362673501 : 22 May 2014), Berkshire > Deeds 1791-1796 vol 3-4 > image 425 of 546; county courthouses and offices, Massachusetts. 

5"Massachusetts, Land Records, 1620-1986," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G9Z8-2H72?cc=2106411&wc=MCBT-JWL%3A361613101%2C362674201 : 22 May 2014), Berkshire > Deeds 1796-1799 vol 5-6 > image 269 of 631; county courthouses and offices, Massachusetts.

6The source connection Joseph to Samuel are secondary. They consist of references to the family in town histories, letters and notes from family historians. 

7Mackenzie, George Norbury, and Nelson Osgood Rhoades, editors. Colonial Families of the United States of America: in Which is Given the History, Genealogy and Armorial Bearings of Colonial Families Who Settled in the American Colonies From the Time of the Settlement of Jamestown, 13th May, 1607, to the Battle of Lexington, 19th April, 1775. 7 volumes. 1912. 

8Jacobus, Donald Lines. History and Genealogy of the Families of Old Fairfield. (Clearfield : Baltimore), 2007. p. 22

9Jacobus, Donald Lines. Additions and corrections to History and genealogy of the families of old Fairfield : supplement to the American Genealogist, October 1943. p. 4.

10 "Berkshire, Massachusetts, United States records," images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CS4Y-7SHG?view=fullText : May 17, 2025), image 430 of 894; . Image Group Number: 007901760

11Watkins, Walter Kendall. Soldiers in the expedition to Canada in 1690 [microform] : and grantees of the Canada townships. (Boston : Printed for the author), 1898. p. 80-84

12Berkshire, Massachusetts, United States records," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CS4Y-7SHN?lang=en?view=fullText : May 17, 2025), image 431 of 894; .
Image Group Number: 007901760

13"Berkshire, Massachusetts, United States records," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CS4Y-7SHV?lang=en?lang=en?view=fullText : May 17, 2025), image 432 of 894; .
Image Group Number: 007901760

14"Bristol, Massachusetts, United States records," images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C9YT-98H4?view=explore : May 18, 2025), image 221 of 745; . Image Group Number: 007703530

15Abstract of probate records at Fairfield, Connecticut, down to 1721. n.d. pp 48, 55, 88, 208 

16History and Genealogy of the Families of Old Fairfield. p.22

17History and Genealogy of the Families of Old Fairfield. p.22; Fairfield Episcopal Church Records. Bathia's baptism might show the family's move to the Anglican Church. James and John Bagley's children were baptized in the Anglican church in Berkshire. John's later children were baptized in the Collegiate Church. This is especially surprising given Anglicans in New York and New England were largely loyalist and the families of James and John were staunchly patriot. 

18James Bagley of Westmoreland Revisited

19The absence of other heirs is interesting. Some researchers identify Mary Dikeman, the wife of  Cornelius Dikeman as Mary Bagley. See Judd, Peter Haring,  Four Amercian Ancestries. p.748. Other researchers have suggested Josiah and William Bagley of Manhattan are the children of Josiah Bagley and Anna Lockwood. See A Wildly Speculative Reconstruction of the Descendants of Josiah Bagley and Ann Lockwood of Fairfield, Connecticut. None of the heirs of either Mary Dikeman or Josiah Bagley are listed.

20Berkshire, Massachusetts land records. 

Saturday, April 19, 2025

Polly Murray, the woman, the myth, the legend

In the Bushnell genealogy, the records for the Bagleys from Nobletown are listed with a a note that Bushell Murray's grand daughter indicated Bushnell had a half brother named James Bagley.1 Several family trees on Ancestry posited Bushnell was the child of Jermiah Bushnell and Mary or Polly Murray. Searches in Berkshire and Columbia county turned up Polly Murry (1790-1848). 

Polly was colorful. In 1813, she sued John M. Hulburt and his guardian for child support for her son born 18 Aug. 1812.2 John Mason Hulbert (1793-1851) was the son of Jonah Hulburt (1753 - 1801)and Jerusha Shepherd (1766 - 1822). In 1813, Jerusha had her hands full. Jonah had died intestate in 1801. While administering his will, Jerusha married John Burghardt.3 John died about the time Polly sued John M. Hulbert.4 John Burghart's family challenged the will which passed his estate exclusively to Jerusha and her children.5 Polly won her lawsuit. John and Jersha appealed. I have not found records of the appeal. I expect the court either refused the appeal, or Polly again won.

 In 1836, James E Bagley sold property to pay off the debts he and his brother/lawyer Oliver Bagley had incurred.6 Among the debts listed is one James had with Polly Murray.  James E. Bagley had a son named James Edward Bagley. James was born in 1825. When he married in 1849 his parents are listed as James and Mary Bagley.7

 Polly Murry died in Austerlitz in 1848.8 Her brother, John Murray bequeathed  money to "the heirs of my deceased sister Polly Murray". There are no distribution papers for the estate so we don't know if the heirs included both the family of Bushnell and James. However, if we believe Bushnell's granddaughter. Bushnell Murry and James E. Bagley a probably the sons of Polly Murry.

1George Eleazer,. Bushnell family genealogy : ancestry and posterity of Francis Bushnell, 1580-1646, of Horsham, England and Guilford, Connecticut, including genealogical notes of other Bushnell families, whose connections with this branch of the family tree have not been determined. (Santa Monica, Calif.: unknown),1949. p 696.

2"Berkshire, Massachusetts, United States records," images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSRS-JS85-P?view=fullText : Apr 5, 2025), image 64 of 620; 

3"Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FHMP-8WT : Fri Mar 08 12:37:05 UTC 2024), Entry for John 2nd Burghardt and Jerusha Hurlbert, 28 March 1802.

4"Berkshire, Massachusetts, United States records," images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSD7-L91M-8?view=fullText : Apr 18, 2025), image 553 of 576; Massachusetts. Probate Court (Berkshire County).

5"Berkshire, Massachusetts, United States records," images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C9YR-RXS5?view=fullText : Apr 18, 2025), image 544 of 572; 

6"New York, Land Records, 1630-1975," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9W7-MXLL?cc=2078654&wc=M7HR-929%3A358136801%2C358385601 : [REFERENCE-ERROR]), Columbia > Deeds 1835-1837 vol Y1-Y2 > image 133 of 510; multiple county courthouses, New York. 

7"Massachusetts, State Vital Records, 1638-1927", FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:N4W5-58K : Thu May 23 00:41:56 UTC 2024), Entry for James E. Bayley and Jane L. Carter, 7 Mar 1849.

8"Berkshire, Massachusetts, United States records," images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSXS-C9Q7-Q?view=fullText : Apr 19, 2025), image 905 of 1147; Massachusetts. Probate Court (Berkshire County).

Tuesday, May 12, 2020

Was Edward Bagley the grandson of James Bagley?

Introduction

 

Edward Bagley of New Brunswick and Utah is possibly the grandson of James and Sarah Bagley of Nobletown, Providence, and Hector. Evidence is largely circumstantial and incomplete. Base on the available evidence, James and Sarah likely had a son named Richard, have strong ties to Connecticut and potentially have four other relatives named Edward and relatives named Cyrenus. Records put a man named Edward Bagley in close proximity to descendants of James Bagley and present a logical reason for Edward's migration to New Brunswick and coincide favorably with family traditions and contemporary records referring to Edward from New Brunswick.


Previous Research

 

Largely what family historians believe about Edward Bagley is based on oral traditions kept by various branches of Edward's family. The traditions are inconsistent and sometimes contradict publicly available records created before and during Edward's lifetime. The family has published these traditions in various books, charts, and family newsletters. The most widely held tradition is Edward Bagley was born on 18 February 1815 in Hartford, Connecticut to Richard Bagley, the youngest son of Isaac and Mehitable Bagley of Amesbury and Esther Puffer the daughter of Amos Puffer. Richard and Ester were married or had an affair about 1814. Richard, along with his sons, moved to New Brunswick in search of timber for the New England shipbuilding trade.

Published family histories available online present variations of this this tradition. The earliest is Maude B. Allen's Samuel Allin (1756-1841), Revolutionary War soldier of North Carolina and Kentucky : a record of his many descendants, 1756-1960. On page 227 there is an un-sourced chart that connects Edward Bagley of  New Brunswick and Salt Lake through his father to Orlando Bagley back to the prophet, Joseph Smith. The chart lists dates that match the family of Richard Bagley of Amesbury. Edward's birth date is given as 18 February 1815. This is the earliest publicly available document that associates Edward Bagley with Richard Bagley of Amesbury and gives a maiden name for Edward's mother. On this chart the name for Edward's mother is given as Esther Peffer. Maude is likely compiling the information received from members of John Grant Bagley's family.

Norton Russell Bagley published a series of manuscripts about Bagley families.  Some Descendants of Richard Bagley and of his son Edward Bagley of New Brunswick and Salt Lake was published in 1973. Based on the introduction, research was conducted mostly by contacting individuals and asking for family relations. Norton stated in Descendants of Richard Bagley there was no "Richard Bagley had dates that would match the father of Edward Bagley" and identified Samuel Bagley of New Brunswick without identifying a relationship with Richard. He identified Amos Puffer's daughter, Esther Puffer, as the married wife of Richard Bagley and referenced the Puffer genealogy by Charles Nutt for dates. Nutt lists birth and death dates for Esther. He does not list any reference to a marriage between Esther Puffer and Richard Bagley. Norton gives Edward the birth date of 18 Feb 1815, notes the record of John Bagley showing Edward was born in New York, and notes other accounts put his birth in Hartford, Connecticut.

Bagley family history : the story of William Henry Bagley, Hannah Brunyer, their Progenitors and Progeny was published by the William Henry Bagley Family Association in 1987. The editors compiled work from several sources including un-sourced pedigree charts showing Richard Bagley of Amesbury and Esther Puffer of Jamaica as Edward's parents. Frances B. Thorn, a granddaughter of Edward provided a biography of Edward and his sons and largely glossed over Edward's parents simply stating that Edward moved from Connecticut where he "was born and worked in the shipping business with his father and brother Richard," to New Brunswick. 

Martha Bagley Halverson published A lasting legacy : the Bagley family history since 1628 in 1997. On page 39, she recounts the family story about Richard and Edward Bagley. She identifies Richard Bagley as Richard of Amesbury, states he was a sea captain, and identifies Esther Puffer - with the dates of Amos' daughter - as the mother of Edward Bagley. She gives Edward the birth date of 18 February 1815. Halverson states "Their son, Edward, told his own children that his father was Richard Bagley and his mother was Esther Puffer." From the bibliography, Halverson lists the journals of John Bagley and Hawley Bagley and interviews with family members as sources. Martha's sources are then Edward's grandchildren and great-grandchildren with written sources from one child.

Clell V. Bagley published Edward Alma Bagley, 1847-1929, His Life and Families in 2005. Clell references the names of Edward's parents from Edward's Patriarchal Blessing in 1855. He refers to a Bagley Bulletin that refutes the identification of Edward's parents as the son of Amos and Esther Puffer of Jamaixa. Clell lists Edward's birthday as Feb. 18, 1815, but acknowledges other records list his birth in 1810 and 1807. Clell lists a land transaction for Edward in 1833 and his marriage that same year.

These five histories and public records agree on key points:
  • Edward Bagley was in the lumber business in New Brunswick
  • Edward Bagley lived in New Brunswick from 1832 to 1855
  • Edward joined the Mormon Church in 1855 and migrated to Utah
  • Edward's father was named Richard
  • Edward's mother was named Esther
  • Edward married Julia Grant in 1833
The disagreements between the histories and public records raise the following questions:
  • When and where was Edward born?
  • What are his father's origins?
  • What is his mother's maiden name? What are her origins?
  • How and when did Edward migrate to New Brunswick? Who if anyone migrated with him?

Clues

Identifying Edward's Birth Place and Date from Original Records

Records created during Edward's lifetime - the 1860 census and Edward's LDS church records give his birth place as "CT", "Old Hartford, Connecticut" and "Hartford, CT". 

His son John Bagley wrote in his diary that his father was from New York. Census records for Edward's children put Edward's birthplace in New York, Connecticut, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, England, Massachusetts and Maine. 
Child1880 Census1900 Census1910 Census1920 Census1930 Census
Charles Stewart Bagley (1835-1913)EnglandConn.Conn.

John Bagley (1836-1923)New BrunswickNew YorkNew YorkNew York
William Henry Bagley (1841-1923)New YorkNew YorkNew YorkEngland
Joseph Smith Bagley (1845-1897)New York



Edward Alma Bagley (1847-1929)ConnecticutNew YorkNew YorkNew York
Cynthia Ann Bagley (1849-1928)New YorkConn.Canada

Hyrum Alvin Bagley (1854-1932)New BrunswickConn.Mass.New YorkMaine

Considering Maine was part of Massachusetts until 1820 and the boundary between New Brunswick and Maine was settled during the life of Edward, we should consider Maine, Canada, Massachusetts, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia to be same place. Charles Stewart's birth place, as well as his mother's birthplace were also identified as England in the 1880 Census. This would indicate either the informant did not know the birth places, or considered Canada part of England. England then should be included with these border lands. Based on census information given for his children, Edward was born in Connecticut, New York, or the contested borderland between Maine and New Brunswick.

The family consistently reports Edward's birth in 1815. External records support an earlier birth date. Census and church records put Edward's birth before 1810. The earliest uncontested record of Edward Bagley is a land transaction - John C. Grant and Abisha his wife sold land to Edward Bagley on 14 July 1832. John is likely the brother of Julia Grant. This is 15 months before Edward's marriage. Edward would be 17 to 25 at the time. In the English colonies of North American, Edward would need to appear at least 21 to purchase land; otherwise, he would need a guardian or parent signature on the contract. Edward signed without a parent or guardian. If he is 21 or older he would have been born in or before 1811.  The 1860 US Census lists Edward's age as 50, making his birth date in 1810. LDS Church records list his birth date as 1807 in the Provo First Ward records and 1809 in his patriarchal blessing. 

For Edward's parents we are looking for a Richard and/or Esther Bagley living in Connecticut, New York, or the contested boundary between Maine and New Brunswick. Ideally, they live in a place that was or is identified as Hartford, or they moved to a place early enough that Edward could misidentified it as his birth place. Ideally, we expect they could appear in records at that location from around the time of Edward's birth and shortly thereafter - roughly from 1800 to 1820.

Mother's Maiden Name

Martha Bagley Halverson identified the maiden name of Esther as Puffer based on the family's oral traditions. Samuel Allin lists the maiden name as Peffer. The uncertainty of the tradition tells us the children likely never met their paternal grandparents. They would not have any direct knowledge of them. Since oral traditions may change over time, the difference makes it likely the actual name sounds like Peffer and Puffer. So in addition to looking at families named Puffer, we should also consider German names like Pfeifer, or Peffer and their English transliterations, Pepper and Peppers, To identify Edward's mother we are looking for a family that lives near a Bagley family with any variant of these names.

Edward's Migration to New Brunswick

As I noted in Edward Bagley: Working Hypotheses, there is an Edward Bagley who joined the US Army in 1829 in Rochester. He is listed as 22 at the time he enlisted and reported his birth place as Connecticut. He did not list a city. He was part of a unit that was building fortifications along the US Canadian border. That unit was stationed at Hancock Barracks in Houlton, Maine. In December 1831 Edward is listed as deserted. If this Edward was stationed in Houlton at the time, this would put him 11 miles and 7 months from the earliest land record for Edward in New Brunswick. This migration would not require any family members in New Brunswick and would explain why there is no direct knowledge of Edward's parents among his children. While this Edward could have traveled to Rochester from anywhere on the East coast, he could also be located near family members. We may be able to identify possible members of Edward's family in and around Rochester. We would expect to find records between roughly 1820 and 1830 for his family.

Family Names

It was a common practice in last half of the 18th Century and the beginning of the 19th Century for colonial English families to follow naming conventions that named children in honor of ancestors. While the practice was not universal, commonly the eldest son was named after his father, the second after his paternal grandfather and the third after the maternal grandfather. Larger families would use other family members such as uncles for sons. Families also often converted family names into first names for sons - so an unusual first name may be the maiden name of a grandmother or great grandmother. A family with a large number of men named Edward or men named Cyrenus could be part of the family of Edward Bagley of New Brunswick.

Comparing Clues to Richard son of James Bagley of Nobletown, Providence, and Hector

Origins for Richard Bagley

As I have shown previous, in James Bagley of Westmoreland County Connecticut, James and Sarah Bagley likely had at least four children - Elias, Bethiah, Richard and Jesse. The first record we have of Richard is in the 1790 census when he is listed as the head of household in Providence, PA. In 1798, he is living on land owned by Elias Bagley. He apparently moved with James to the finger lakes region of New York. In 1803, Jesse and Richard Bagley are listed in the New York tax rolls for Milton, New York (modern Genoa). In 1809 Richard purchases land in Hector, New York. In 1811, he sells that land to Jesse Bagley. At about the same time, Elias also buys and sells land in Hector, New York.

I have found three other records that may refer to this Richard:
  • In 1817 a Richard Bagley, Cordwainer, enlisted in the US Army in New Orleans. He was born about 1774 in Columbia County, New York. 
  • Richard Bagley, merchant, aged 50 entered New York in 1825. 
  • Richard V. Bagley applied for a Revolutionary War bounty in 1833 from Christian County, Kentucky. He claimed he was born in 1766 in Hudson, New York and he served as a substitute for Samuel Darling in the Ninth Albany Militia. His claim was denied. The Ninth Albany Militia was raised in the area that would become Columbia county. Three men named Bagley appear on the rolls of the Ninth Albany Militia during the Revolutionary War - James, John, and Edward.1
It is not clear whether each record refers to the same individual, or if they refer to the son of James and Sarah.

Family Connections to Connecticut

 

James and John Bagley are listed as proprietors in Nobletown in 1764. Many of these families came from western Connecticut or were disgruntled tenants of Robert Livingston. James and John were likely from Connecticut. James and Sarah's daughter, Bethia, was baptized in 1773. At  about the same time James Bagley, Elias Bixby, and Zacher H. Squire purchased a partial right in the Susquehannah Purchase. Elias Bixby was likely from Fairfield, Connecticut. The Bixby and Bagley families seem to be closely aligned. Besides being neighbors in Nobletown and Westmoreland, Connecticut, John Bagley's daughter, likely James' niece, Mercy, married Elias Bixby's grandson, Hull.


James Bagley and his wife Bethiah Munroe lived in the same general area of Fairfield as Elias Bixby. James and Bethiah's daughter Lydia was baptized in Westport. A Lydia Bagley married George Grimes in Sheffield, Massachusetts in 1757. James Bagley the father of Lydia is the son of John Bagley.  The proprietors of Nobletown could be named after James and his father. The daughter of James, Bethia Bagley, could be named after her grandmother, Bethiah Munroe. This would follow common naming conventions for English colonial families.

Tentative Family Tree for Jame Bagley and Bethia Munroe


The migration path from western Connecticut, to western Massachusetts and then to New York was common. While it is far from definitive, the children of James and Bethia are probably James, John and Lydia.

In the Nobletown records, James Bagley was chosen to advocate the legitimacy of the Nobletown claim over the claim of Robert Livingston. In Luzerne county he was strong advocate for the Connecticut claim over the Pennsylvania claim. James served in the Westmoreland Independent Company during the Revolutionary war as part of the Connecticut Line. From these records, we can see James identified strongly with Connecticut and may have passed this attitude on to his children and grandchildren.

Neighboring Peffer Families

 

In Pennsylvania and New York, Richard's family lived close to families with a variation of the family name in Edward's family oral tradition. John Pepper is listed as a head of household in Luzerne County in 1790 in the same enumeration district as Richard and Ezra Bagley. Michael and Peter Phiper or Phifer are listed in Milton, NY in 1800. Michael Peffer or Pipher is also listed on the 1799, 1800, and 1803 New York tax roles in Milton. Each record likely refers to the same person. Richard and Jesse Bagley are listed in the Milton 1803 tax rolls. These records would put Richard Bagley, the son of James, in close proximity to families with a name that would match family oral tradition.

 

Old Hartford

 
In the 1820 Census an Elias Pagley is living in Avon, New York. This is likely the son of James Bagley. Elias moved his family to Irwin Township, Pennsylvania. In 1826 he purchased land there. He moved there with his wife Phebe and sons Alanson and Azor. The ages of these sons match the ages of the individuals listed in the 1820 census in Avon. Alanson was born in Pennsylvania at the time Elias Bagley lived in Luzerne County. Azor was born in New York after the family would have moved to New York. This parallels the family of Jesse Bagley, whose elder son, Jinks, was born in the Wyoming river valley and whose younger son, Jesse, was born in New York. 

Avon is south of Rochester. When Avon was settled in 1797 it was called Hartford. The name was changed to Avon in 1808. The last records for Elias and Richard in Hector is 1810 and 1811.  An Elias Pagley is listed in Avon in 1820. This 1820 federal census shows a possible presence in Avon. The pension application for Jenks Bagley  puts the family of Jesse Bagley in the area around Rochester at the same time. If Richard moved his family with his brothers' families, or if Edward was cared for by his uncles he could have been in the area at least through the middle of the 1820s. Edward Bagley who enlisted in the US Army in 1829 would then be a long time resident of  the area. This Edward would then be connected to Old Hartford through the family of James Bagley. 

 

Shared Family Names

 
Shared family names sometimes indicate a relationship between two families. The family of James Bagley has potentially four men named Edward Bagley.
  1. Richard's brother Jesse moved his family to Michigan. His son Jenks likely had a son named Edward. 
  2. At the same time Jesse and his sons Jenks and Jesse moved to Michigan, Edward Bagley from Erie county, New York purchased land in that same part of Michigan. Jenks' pension applications put him in this part of New York prior to moving to Michigan. Edward's age would put him in the gap between Jenks and Jesse making it possible he is a brother.
  3. During the Revolutionary War, an Edward Bagley was listed on the rolls of the Ninth Albany Militia. This man later was a neighbor of John Bagley in Columbia county. While no direct connection to James or John can be found, Edward's age and residence mean he could be 
    • a son of James who remained in New York when his father moved to Westmoreland county, 
    • a son of John Bagley, or 
    • a brother of Lt Josiah Bagley from New York City
    • someone from another Bagley family

    The first three possibilities for Edward would make him a brother or cousin of Richard.
  4. Edward Bagley of Columbia county has a grandson named Edward.
The family of James son, Jesse, has one, possibly two men named Edward. Edward Bagley the neighbor of John Bagley is possibly a son, nephew, or cousin of James Bagley.

Possible Descendants of John Bagley named Edward


The name Cyrenus is attached to Edward by tradition - no records from his lifetime list this name. There are two men named Cyrenus Bagley with no known connection to Edward - Cyrenus Chapin Bagley and his son Cyrenus Augustus Bagley. A tenuous connection can be drawn between the families. John A Bagley is the father of Cyrenus Chapin Bagley. In Holland Land Company records, John A. Bagley and Gilbert Bagley assumed the payments of John Bagley. Often, children would assume the payment on land after a parent died. It is likely John A and Gilbert are the sons of John Bagley. According to a family bible, John A was born about 1795 in Pennsylvania. There is a John Bagley listed in Providence, PA in the 1800 Pennsylvania census. If John A. were born in the Wyoming Valley, John could be James' neighbor and possibly James' son named after his brother and grandfather.

Summary and Future Research

Edward Bagley of New Brunswick and Utah is possibly the grandson of James and Sarah Bagley of Nobletown, Providence, and Hector. Based on records created during Edward's life time, Edward was likely born before 1811. He identified his birthplace as Connecticut; however, his family identified his birthplace as Connecticut, New York and border between Maine and New Bruinswick. Oral family tradition gives Edward's mother the maiden name "Peffer" or "Puffer". His children likely did not know their grandparents or other members of their father's family. An Edward Bagley joined the US Army in 1829 in Rochester. The unit he joined was stationed on the northeastern border between the United States and the British Colonies. This individual deserted in December 1831. Edward first purchased land in New Brunswick in 1832. It is likely this is the same person.

Richard, the son of James and Sarah Bagley, is a possible match for the father of Edward Bagley based on the existing records and oral traditions. We can match the details recorded about the father of Edward to this man:
  • Richard would have been in New York at the time of Edward's birth. This is one of the three places identified by his children. 
  • Before Edward's birth, this Richard lived near families with names that match the traditional maiden name of Edward's mother. 
  • James, Richard's father, was likely from Connecticut and has a documented affiliation for Connecticut. Edward may have confused the family being "from Connecticut" with his birth place.
  • Elias, Richard's brother, likely lived in Avon, New York which was known as Hartford prior to 1808. Richard may have lived in or visited this Hartford, offering a possible explanation for "Old Hartford" on Edward's church records.
  • Richard's brothers and nephews lived in the Rochester area through the middle of the 1820's showing the family was present in that part of New York, shortly before Edward Bagley enlisted. 
  • Richard's family has one and possibly as many as four men named Edward, not counting Edward Bagley of New Brunswick, making it plausible Edward is a family name.
  • There is a tentative connection between this family and the family of Cyrenus Bagley of New York, Ontario and Michigan.
The following further research is needed:
  • We don't know what happened to Richard after 1811. We can not show that Richard had children or married. No records have been found identifying a woman who could be his wife. We don't know if Richard is the cordwainer in New Orleans, the merchant in New York, or the pension applicant in Kentucky.
  • We can show the unit Edward Bagley joined was stationed along the Canadian border and at various times, parts of it were in Maine. Existing muster rolls available  for the US Army might show where Edward Bagley was stationed between 1829 and 1831 and confirm how close he was to the New Brunswick border.
Western New York was the frontier at the time James Bagley's family lived there. Records are scarce and incomplete. As records from this era become available, we have a clearer picture of James Bagley and his family. This picture presents a plausible story showing Edward could be the grandson of James Bagley.

1Samuel Darling and men named Bagley served in the Ninth Albany Militia during the Revolutionary War: Asher Bagley; John Bagley, likely the brother of James Bagley; James Bagley - possibly the man who served in the Connecticut Line; and Edward Bagley. See New York in the Revolution as a Colony and State. pp. 116, 117, 230  

Thursday, July 4, 2019

James and Edward Bagley - Columbia County, New York and Berkshire County, Massachusetts

Good Morning Folks,

It's the Fourth of July. Fold3 opened the Revolution War Pension records for the holiday. Due to the diligent indexing work of the employees at Fold3, I was able to find a Revolutionary War Pension application for Abraham Humaston, (Record Group 15 Records of the Department of Veterans Affairs, 1773 - 2007. NARA M804. Revolutionary War Pension and Bounty-Land Warrant Application Files. Humaston, Abraham. Pension R. 5369.)

The heirs of Abraham Hummiston [sic] applied for his Revolutionary war pension under the Act of 1832 from Albany County, NY on 11 March 1846. They believed he had filed an application for a pension 20 years prior that was still pending when he died in 1843. The file includes a rejection dated 28 February 1826 for Abraham Humerston, based on his name not being in the rolls for Col. Swift's regiment. In 1832, he applied again listing the following service:
  • 1775 Capt. Ford's Company of minutemen in Green River (Chatham, Columbia, NY)
  • May 1776 enlisted in Wyoming (Wilkes-Barre, Luzerne, PA) Capt. Durgee or Durkee's Company
  • He continued with Durgy's until he was in the hospital in Morristown (NJ)
  • He joined Col. Peirson or Parson's Regiment in Newark, NJ and was discharged in New Haven, CT in Aug. 1782
Among the affidavits supporting the 1832 application is a one from James Leggett of Berne, New York dated 23 May 1837. James Leggett states that Abraham named two witnesses that could prove his claim - James and Edward Bagley of Sheffield, Massachusetts. Mr. Leggett went to Sheffield:

"I went last Monday to the town of Sheffield aforesaid for the purpose of finding James Bagley and Edward Bagley, but on enquiring learned that they were dead. That James Bagley had been dead sometime and Edward Bagley died this spring. I also learned on enquiring of several persons in that town that the said James Bagley and Edward Bagley were reputed to have been soldiers in the Revolutionary War, but they were men of considerable property, and had never applied for pensions."

James Bagley of Nobletown, Providence, and Hector is likely the James Bagley Leggett was seeking. He had extensive land holdings in Nobletown - 2 sixty-fourths and 1 256th which translates into roughly 600 acres. He purchased land in Providence soon after arriving in 1776. He had extensive lands in Luzerne County when he left in the early 19th century. He served in Durkee's Company, the same Company as Abraham.

Edward Bagley (1761-1837) is likely the Edward Bagley Leggett was seeking. He has an extensive record of land transactions in Columbia and Berkshire counties. He served in the 9th Albany militia. He died in April, 1837.

Edward's widow Fanny and some of his children were still in Columbia and Berkshire counties after Edward's death. If they were the source for Leggett's information, the family of Edward was aware of James death. It is plausible the families are closely related. Edward may be the son or nephew of James Bagley.

This gives us a list of men named Edward Bagley who could be related to James:

  1. Edward Bagley of Columbia, New York - James and Sarah's son or nephew
  2. Edward L. Bagley of NYC - the son of Lewis Bagley and grandson of Edward of Columbia
  3. Edward Bagley of Erie, New York and Superior, MI  - possibly a son of Jesse and Phebe Bagley and grandson of James
  4. Edward Bagley of Superior, MI - teenager living with Jenks and Phebe Bagley in 1850 - likely a son; ie grandson of Jesse, g. grandson of James
  5. Edward Bagley of New York, New Brunswick and Utah - possibly the son of Richard, grandson of James

A tentative family tree for Edward Bagley New York, New Brunswick and Utah looks like:

Edward Bagley (about 1809 - 1868) is the son of Richard Bagley (about 1775 to after 1811) and Esther [Peffer?] (about 1780 - )
Richard is the son of James Bagley (before 1742 - after 1810) and Sarah (about 1740 - ) of Nobletown, Providence, and Hector
James is the son of James Bagley (1704 - ) of Fairfield and Bethia Munroe (1711 - ) daughter of David Munroe
James is the son of John Bagley (1668 - ) of Weymouth and Fairfield and Mary Jackson (1670 - ) daughter of Joseph Jackson
James is the son of Samuel Bagley (1634 - 1711) of England and Weymouth and Mary

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

Bagley Families in Columbia County New York and Berkshire County Massachuttes

As far as I can tell, Lt. Josiah Bagley (1759 - 1848) settled in the area of Hillsdale, Columbia County, New York. His grave is across the border in Riverside Cemetery, Egremont, Massachusetts,1 which was the Green River Cemetery in Green River, New York.2 Another Josiah Bagley (1756 - 1831) is also buried in Riverside cemetery. This is likely the father of Eli Bagley.3 This may be the Josiah Bagly who served as a private in Van Ness' Albany County Militia - Ninth Regiment.4 The Ninth Regiment also contains a John Bagly. Edward Bagley, James Bagly and John Bagly were granted land bounty rights for service in the Ninth Regiment.5 The Ninth Regiment was raised in Claverack which became part of Columbia County.The Church Records of St. James Church in Great Barrington list children born to couples named Bagley living in Nobletown:7
  • Rhoda, Benjamin and Hannah, children of John and Prudence8
  • Elias son of James and Sarah9
  • David, son of Abigail10
Columbia county is a crossroad for people heading west from all over New England. There are different identifiable unrelated and distantly related families migrating at the same time. Lt. Josiah is possibly the great grandson of John Bagley(b 1668) through his son Josiah (b1702).11 John Holroyd Bagley(1806-1891) who settled in Hudson, is probably Josiah's cousin through his grandfather David Bagley(1752-1793), the grandson of Joseph Bagley(1672-1746) of Providence, RI - John's brother.12 The John Bagly who served in the Ninth may be John Bagley (1731-1797) who appears on one of the first Juries in 178713 and in the 1790 Census14. He is likely buried in Collins Cemetery.15 He may be the father of Rhoda, Benjamin, and Hannah.

Edward Bagley (1761-1837) may be the Edward that received the land bounty for service in the Ninth; he would have been about 16 at the time of the campaign which would have been in the ages defined by the Continental Congress.16 Edward was married at least twice and had several children. He served as a justice of the peace and supervisor in Hillsdale.17 He contracted several land transactions in Columbia and Berkshire Counties in the first decades of the 19th century.18 There is no clear record if he is related to any of his neighbors from the same generation.

James Bagley, the father of Elias and husband of Sarah, is probably not the James Bagly that received land bounty rights from NY. James and Sarah likely migrated to North Eastern Pennsylvania where he serve in the Connecticut 24th.19

1"Find A Grave Search Results." Find A Grave Search Results. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 May. 2017. <https://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gsr&GSfn=Josiah&GSmn=&GSln=Bagley&GSbyrel=all&GSby=&GSdyrel=all&GSdy=&GScntry=4&GSst=21&GScnty=1174&GSgrid=&df=all&GSob=n>.
2"Lieut Josiah Bagley (1759 - 1848) - Find A Grave Memorial." Lieut Josiah Bagley (1759 - 1848) - Find A Grave Memorial. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 May. 2017. <https://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSln=Bagley&GSiman=1&GScid=2181015&GRid=42315000&>.
3"Delaware County, New York; history of the centu...." Delaware County, New York; history of the centu.... N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2017. "Biographical review : this volume contains biog...." <https://archive.org/stream/delawarecountyne00murr#page/390/mode/2up/>.; "Biographical review : this volume contains biog...." Biographical review : this volume contains biog.... N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2017. <https://archive.org/stream/biographicalrevi02bost#page/n487/mode/2up/>.
4"Documents relative to the colonial history of the ... v.15. - Full View | HathiTrust Digital Library | HathiTrust Digital Library." Documents relative to the colonial history of the ... v.15. - Full View | HathiTrust Digital Library | HathiTrust Digital Library. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 May. 2017. <https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=yale.39002002201292;view=1up;seq=330>.
5"New York in the Revolution as colony and state;...." New York in the Revolution as colony and state;.... N.p., n.d. Web. 19 May. 2017. <https://archive.org/stream/newyorkinrevolut00newy#page/230/mode/2up>.
6"Albany County Militia: Organization." Albany County Militia: Organization. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 May. 2017. <http://www.nyhistory.net/drums/militia_albany.htm>.
 7Nobletown is now part of Hillsdale, NY and Egremont, MA.  See "In Search of Nobletown." Hillsdale Historians. (https://hillsdalehistorians.wordpress.com/2018/01/31/in-search-of-nobletown/, Accessed 24 March 2019)
8St. James' Church records (1903) 53. (https://archive.org/details/stjameschurchrec00grea/page/n17)
9St. James' Church records (1903) 58. (https://archive.org/details/stjameschurchrec00grea/page/58)
10St. James' Church records (1903) 61. (https://archive.org/details/stjameschurchrec00grea/page/62)
11A Wildly Speculative Reconstruction of the Descendants of Josiah Bagley and Ann Lockwood of Fairfield, Connecticut (https://rabbithelpdesk.blogspot.com/2018/07/a-wildly-speculative-reconstruction-of.html)
12John Holroyd Bagley and John Holroyd (https://rabbithelpdesk.blogspot.com/2017/06/john-holroyd-bagley-and-john-holroyd.html) Luther Bagley: a follow up on John Holroyd Bagley (https://rabbithelpdesk.blogspot.com/2017/11/luther-bagley-follow-up-on-john-holroyd.html)
13Ellis, Franklin. History of Columbia County, New York. (Everts & Ensign : Philadelphia, 1787) 59. (https://archive.org/details/historyofcolumbi00ever/page/58)
14p"United States Census, 1790," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XHKP-6FF : accessed 23 March 2019), John Bagley, Hillsdale, Columbia, New York, United States; citing p. 231, NARA microfilm publication M637, (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll 6; FHL microfilm 568,146.
15"John Bagley (Unknown-1797) - Find A Grave Memorial." John Bagley (Unknown-1797) - Find A Grave Memorial. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 March 2019 <https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/22642392/john-bagley>
16The Continental Congress set the age for militia between 16 and 50. United States Congressional Serial Set, Volume 2809. (U.S. Government Printing Office, 1891) 9.
17Collin, John Francis. A history of Hillsdale, Columbia County, New York. (Philmont, New York: 1883).  58, 80. (https://archive.org/stream/historyofhillsda00coll#page/n39/mode/2up)
18You can see these lists of transactions in the land record index books available on FamilySearch:

Columbia County Grantor Index 1772-1925 A-G. 67.  "New York Land Records, 1630-1975," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G9W7-F2BD?cc=2078654&wc=M7HG-T6N%3A358136801%2C358136802 : 22 May 2014), Columbia > Grantor index 1772-1925 A-G > image 65 of 716; county courthouses, New York.

Columbia County Grantee index 1772-1925 A-D. 67. "New York Land Records, 1630-1975," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-89W7-H5YH?cc=2078654&wc=M7HP-F29%3A358136801%2C358190301 : 22 May 2014), Columbia > Grantee index 1772-1925 A-D > image 53 of 494; county courthouses, New York.

Berkshire County Southern District Deed index (grantee) 1825-1874 A-Z "Massachusetts Land Records, 1620-1986," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9Z8-7HKY?cc=2106411&wc=MCBT-829%3A361613101%2C362632901 : 22 May 2014), Berkshire > Deed index (grantee) 1825-1874 A-Z > image 29 of 592; county courthouses and offices, Massachusetts.

Berkshire County Southern District Deed index (grantor) 1825-1874 A-K "Massachusetts Land Records, 1620-1986," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L9Z8-3JMG?cc=2106411&wc=MCBT-6WG%3A361613101%2C362638201 : 22 May 2014), Berkshire > Deeds 1836-1839 vol 75-76 > image 474 of 619; county courthouses and offices, Massachusetts.

19
James Bagley of Westmoreland County Connecticut